<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Subjectivity and Objectivity Clash: Looking Back on Hatsukoi Limited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/2009/08/26/when-subjectivity-and-objectivity-clash-looking-back-on-hatsukoi-limited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/2009/08/26/when-subjectivity-and-objectivity-clash-looking-back-on-hatsukoi-limited/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, insight, and analysis from a starry-eyed fan seeking enlightenment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:46:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 初恋限定 ~ Hatsukoi Limited &#171; WAWAWA 忘れ物</title>
		<link>http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/2009/08/26/when-subjectivity-and-objectivity-clash-looking-back-on-hatsukoi-limited/comment-page-1/#comment-6198</link>
		<dc:creator>初恋限定 ~ Hatsukoi Limited &#171; WAWAWA 忘れ物</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/?p=2382#comment-6198</guid>
		<description>[...] tsundere power ^^  I suppose it is pretty ordinary and not so deep if you really look at it&#8230; eternal has the perfect post for you if that&#8217;s what ya think ^^  Though again for the record, I am [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tsundere power ^^  I suppose it is pretty ordinary and not so deep if you really look at it&#8230; eternal has the perfect post for you if that&#8217;s what ya think ^^  Though again for the record, I am [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ETERNAL</title>
		<link>http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/2009/08/26/when-subjectivity-and-objectivity-clash-looking-back-on-hatsukoi-limited/comment-page-1/#comment-4131</link>
		<dc:creator>ETERNAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/?p=2382#comment-4131</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@ ghostlightning:&lt;/b&gt; Fantasy or not my point stays the same, but when I said that the problems were the same as in real life, I think I was referring to the characters&#039; thought processes. As in, Kei x Kappa is implausible in the real world, but their reactions to one another seemed believable. Kusuda was tsundere for Kei right from the start, pretending to not be interested even though he obviously was; Kei said that he was ugly and that she would never like him, because she&#039;s attractive enough to find a more attractive guy. The end result was &quot;fantasy&quot; fulfilling - in quotations because it doesn&#039;t fulfill any fantasy of mine - but the whole issue of looks vs. personality is something that everyone goes through IRL, to the point that you don&#039;t want to see it in fiction. Or at least I don&#039;t.

Don&#039;t forget, though, the show would only lose &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; points with me if it were painted as a typical fantasy-fulfilling shounen romance. It doesn&#039;t change the fact that the serious issues were either frustrating or pointless.

&lt;b&gt;@ digitalboy:&lt;/b&gt; As I was writing this, I was thinking of your tweet on True Tears and realized that this was basically the same thing. It&#039;s &lt;i&gt;technically&lt;/i&gt; not a bad show, but for lack of a better word, it pissed me off.

I don&#039;t see what&#039;s misleading about the post title though. It&#039;s a little vague, I guess, but I didn&#039;t want anyone thinking that I was accusing the show of being bad - or worse yet, that I was using personal opinion as a legitimate argument for accusing the show of being bad. This one was tl;dr&#039;d more than necessary because I was talking about a vague opinion that I still can&#039;t word properly, but I&#039;m trying to stay just under 1000 words unless I have something very specific and meaty to talk about.
(heh, how&#039;s that for a needlessly tl;dr reply?)

&lt;b&gt;@ Sorrow-kun:&lt;/b&gt; That sounds about right. My enjoyment was decreased on top of that because it clashed with my taste in romance - as opposed to an average shounen-romance which isn&#039;t good but is still fun to watch - but it had a few entertaining moments. Considering the nature of the characters&#039; relationships with each other, I&#039;m not sure if spending more time observing them would have deepened the show much, but at least a bit of introspection would have been nice.

&lt;b&gt;@ relentlessflame:&lt;/b&gt; I guess I was vague in wording the post title, but when I said that objectivity and subjectivity &lt;i&gt;clashed&lt;/i&gt;, I was referring to my own interests (which is why I used that intro paragraph). I&#039;m saying that the show is objectively &quot;not bad&quot; - maybe not Good, but definitely not Bad - but my &lt;i&gt;enjoyment&lt;/i&gt; of it was closer to being Bad, because of everything I said. Taste has little to do with it since I was focusing on why I didn&#039;t like it, not why a person should or shouldn&#039;t like it.

Anyway, shows like this would usually appeal to me, even if they&#039;re not particularly deep, but Hatsukoi felt more like a clumsy teenager talking about love than anything else. I don&#039;t mind over-the-top cheesiness and fantasy-fulfillment, but Hatsukoi at least &lt;i&gt;pretends&lt;/i&gt; to be real, and the &quot;real&quot; aspects of it are 80% annoying little details about life that I outgrew years ago, with maybe 20% truth and/or relateability.

&lt;b&gt;@ orion:&lt;/b&gt; I talked about the realism aspect in my other replies, but long story short, my dislike of it wasn&#039;t because it was fantasy fulfilling or not fantasy fulfilling. Thanks for saying that the post was the right length though; I always get paranoid when breaking the 1k barrier because I know I tend to ramble, but it would be even worse if I wrote too little and left holes everywhere.

&lt;b&gt;@ omo:&lt;/b&gt; Yeah, that was probably just careless wording on my part. Like I said in response to relentless, it was in relation to my own enjoyment. For the &quot;realistic&quot; aspect, I suppose half of that was because the show deals with extremely ordinary things (as opposed to the typical Sudden Girlfriend Appearance, etc), and the other half was that the fantasy-fulfillment just didn&#039;t work for me. You see, if it were an ordinary shounen romance with a shallow but entertaining plot, I would have watched it, not thought much about it, finished it, and not posted on it. It wouldn&#039;t have been that great, but I wouldn&#039;t bother saying anything because it was mediocre for the obvious reasons.

For me, Hatsukoi was mediocre for &lt;i&gt;un&lt;/i&gt;obvious reasons, somewhat like what digiboy said in reference to being &quot;pissed off.&quot; If you&#039;re going to give us a cheesy fantasy-fulfilling story of first love, then sure, why not. If you&#039;re going to give us a realistic look at the joy and hardship of first love, then better yet. But all the show did was introduce stereotypical love triangles, unrequited love, etc etc, and the issues were, for lack of a better word, shallow. It works pretty well as a comedy and if it didn&#039;t take itself seriously, but in trying to be realistic, it ended up frustrating me with insecurities about things like looks and breast size instead of talking about what it was supposed to be about: first love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@ ghostlightning:</b> Fantasy or not my point stays the same, but when I said that the problems were the same as in real life, I think I was referring to the characters&#8217; thought processes. As in, Kei x Kappa is implausible in the real world, but their reactions to one another seemed believable. Kusuda was tsundere for Kei right from the start, pretending to not be interested even though he obviously was; Kei said that he was ugly and that she would never like him, because she&#8217;s attractive enough to find a more attractive guy. The end result was &#8220;fantasy&#8221; fulfilling &#8211; in quotations because it doesn&#8217;t fulfill any fantasy of mine &#8211; but the whole issue of looks vs. personality is something that everyone goes through IRL, to the point that you don&#8217;t want to see it in fiction. Or at least I don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget, though, the show would only lose <i>more</i> points with me if it were painted as a typical fantasy-fulfilling shounen romance. It doesn&#8217;t change the fact that the serious issues were either frustrating or pointless.</p>
<p><b>@ digitalboy:</b> As I was writing this, I was thinking of your tweet on True Tears and realized that this was basically the same thing. It&#8217;s <i>technically</i> not a bad show, but for lack of a better word, it pissed me off.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see what&#8217;s misleading about the post title though. It&#8217;s a little vague, I guess, but I didn&#8217;t want anyone thinking that I was accusing the show of being bad &#8211; or worse yet, that I was using personal opinion as a legitimate argument for accusing the show of being bad. This one was tl;dr&#8217;d more than necessary because I was talking about a vague opinion that I still can&#8217;t word properly, but I&#8217;m trying to stay just under 1000 words unless I have something very specific and meaty to talk about.<br />
(heh, how&#8217;s that for a needlessly tl;dr reply?)</p>
<p><b>@ Sorrow-kun:</b> That sounds about right. My enjoyment was decreased on top of that because it clashed with my taste in romance &#8211; as opposed to an average shounen-romance which isn&#8217;t good but is still fun to watch &#8211; but it had a few entertaining moments. Considering the nature of the characters&#8217; relationships with each other, I&#8217;m not sure if spending more time observing them would have deepened the show much, but at least a bit of introspection would have been nice.</p>
<p><b>@ relentlessflame:</b> I guess I was vague in wording the post title, but when I said that objectivity and subjectivity <i>clashed</i>, I was referring to my own interests (which is why I used that intro paragraph). I&#8217;m saying that the show is objectively &#8220;not bad&#8221; &#8211; maybe not Good, but definitely not Bad &#8211; but my <i>enjoyment</i> of it was closer to being Bad, because of everything I said. Taste has little to do with it since I was focusing on why I didn&#8217;t like it, not why a person should or shouldn&#8217;t like it.</p>
<p>Anyway, shows like this would usually appeal to me, even if they&#8217;re not particularly deep, but Hatsukoi felt more like a clumsy teenager talking about love than anything else. I don&#8217;t mind over-the-top cheesiness and fantasy-fulfillment, but Hatsukoi at least <i>pretends</i> to be real, and the &#8220;real&#8221; aspects of it are 80% annoying little details about life that I outgrew years ago, with maybe 20% truth and/or relateability.</p>
<p><b>@ orion:</b> I talked about the realism aspect in my other replies, but long story short, my dislike of it wasn&#8217;t because it was fantasy fulfilling or not fantasy fulfilling. Thanks for saying that the post was the right length though; I always get paranoid when breaking the 1k barrier because I know I tend to ramble, but it would be even worse if I wrote too little and left holes everywhere.</p>
<p><b>@ omo:</b> Yeah, that was probably just careless wording on my part. Like I said in response to relentless, it was in relation to my own enjoyment. For the &#8220;realistic&#8221; aspect, I suppose half of that was because the show deals with extremely ordinary things (as opposed to the typical Sudden Girlfriend Appearance, etc), and the other half was that the fantasy-fulfillment just didn&#8217;t work for me. You see, if it were an ordinary shounen romance with a shallow but entertaining plot, I would have watched it, not thought much about it, finished it, and not posted on it. It wouldn&#8217;t have been that great, but I wouldn&#8217;t bother saying anything because it was mediocre for the obvious reasons.</p>
<p>For me, Hatsukoi was mediocre for <i>un</i>obvious reasons, somewhat like what digiboy said in reference to being &#8220;pissed off.&#8221; If you&#8217;re going to give us a cheesy fantasy-fulfilling story of first love, then sure, why not. If you&#8217;re going to give us a realistic look at the joy and hardship of first love, then better yet. But all the show did was introduce stereotypical love triangles, unrequited love, etc etc, and the issues were, for lack of a better word, shallow. It works pretty well as a comedy and if it didn&#8217;t take itself seriously, but in trying to be realistic, it ended up frustrating me with insecurities about things like looks and breast size instead of talking about what it was supposed to be about: first love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omo</title>
		<link>http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/2009/08/26/when-subjectivity-and-objectivity-clash-looking-back-on-hatsukoi-limited/comment-page-1/#comment-4130</link>
		<dc:creator>omo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/?p=2382#comment-4130</guid>
		<description>What Relentless said. I mean I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re saying IRT your own preferences. I guess I can think about it and try to see what you imply by calling Hatsukoi Limited as &quot;realistic.&quot; There&#039;s definitely both fantasy and realistic elements in the relationships...or perhaps just a lot of comical exaggerations. At the same time I think there is humor in the almost-truisms in the show. The world is a big place--there are people who are like Koyoi out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Relentless said. I mean I&#8217;m not sure what you&#8217;re saying IRT your own preferences. I guess I can think about it and try to see what you imply by calling Hatsukoi Limited as &#8220;realistic.&#8221; There&#8217;s definitely both fantasy and realistic elements in the relationships&#8230;or perhaps just a lot of comical exaggerations. At the same time I think there is humor in the almost-truisms in the show. The world is a big place&#8211;there are people who are like Koyoi out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 0rion</title>
		<link>http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/2009/08/26/when-subjectivity-and-objectivity-clash-looking-back-on-hatsukoi-limited/comment-page-1/#comment-4129</link>
		<dc:creator>0rion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/?p=2382#comment-4129</guid>
		<description>I agree with you in the feeling that Hatsukoi Limited was decidedly middle of the road. Realistic though? I don&#039;t know that I would call it that.

@ digitalboy

tl;dr??

This is only like 1000 words! And I certainly don&#039;t feel like he was wasting them; I think rather would&#039;ve been disappointed if he didn&#039;t explain himself as well as he did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you in the feeling that Hatsukoi Limited was decidedly middle of the road. Realistic though? I don&#8217;t know that I would call it that.</p>
<p>@ digitalboy</p>
<p>tl;dr??</p>
<p>This is only like 1000 words! And I certainly don&#8217;t feel like he was wasting them; I think rather would&#8217;ve been disappointed if he didn&#8217;t explain himself as well as he did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: relentlessflame</title>
		<link>http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/2009/08/26/when-subjectivity-and-objectivity-clash-looking-back-on-hatsukoi-limited/comment-page-1/#comment-4128</link>
		<dc:creator>relentlessflame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/?p=2382#comment-4128</guid>
		<description>I &lt;i&gt;think&lt;/i&gt; what you&#039;re trying to say is that the series didn&#039;t work for you because it was neither fantastical nor highly-involving; that the relationships and issues portrayed were rather mundane and straightforward.  But I&#039;m not sure what the perceived &quot;clash&quot; between objectivity and subjectivity is; your main point seems to be &quot;the show did what it was trying to do just fine, but it just wasn&#039;t all that entertaining to me&quot;.  Within lies the realization that most anime bloggers completely fail to grasp: your enjoyment is not objective, and whether something is a Good Show(TM) or a Bad Show(TM) has rarely anything to do with anything of real importance.  It mostly serves as a way for people on the blogosphere to prove to others that they have Good Taste, which is completely irrelevant on a personal level.  You like what you like, and there&#039;s nothing wrong with that.  Your time is valuable; you arguably stand to lose more by watching something you don&#039;t enjoy because others say it&#039;s Good than you do by just watching whatever you feel like even if it&#039;s &quot;Bad&quot;.

Anyway, all that being said, I think a certain part of the appeal of Hatsukoi Limited is precisely because it doesn&#039;t attempt to bite off more than it can chew.  The conflicts are simple and straightforward because most of them are only given one or two episodes, and need to wrap up cleanly within that time.  It&#039;s more like a collection of short stories centered around a common theme, and isn&#039;t necessarily trying to be overly ambitious in that regard.  So certainly, this type of storytelling approach won&#039;t appeal to everyone, &quot;good&quot; or &quot;bad&quot; aside.  Apparently, it&#039;s just not your sort of show; fair enough.  I would say, personally, it isn&#039;t necessarily my favourite type of show either (I too tend to favour romantic dramas and shows with a bit more conflict and introspection), but at the same time I was able to enjoy it within the scope it gave itself.  It&#039;s one of the few times where the 12-episode length felt like the right amount of time for the content, and things just seemed to &quot;click&quot;.

So, anyway... the good part of the experience is that you now have a better sense of what shows to gravitate towards and to avoid going forward, and that&#039;s always a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <i>think</i> what you&#8217;re trying to say is that the series didn&#8217;t work for you because it was neither fantastical nor highly-involving; that the relationships and issues portrayed were rather mundane and straightforward.  But I&#8217;m not sure what the perceived &#8220;clash&#8221; between objectivity and subjectivity is; your main point seems to be &#8220;the show did what it was trying to do just fine, but it just wasn&#8217;t all that entertaining to me&#8221;.  Within lies the realization that most anime bloggers completely fail to grasp: your enjoyment is not objective, and whether something is a Good Show(TM) or a Bad Show(TM) has rarely anything to do with anything of real importance.  It mostly serves as a way for people on the blogosphere to prove to others that they have Good Taste, which is completely irrelevant on a personal level.  You like what you like, and there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that.  Your time is valuable; you arguably stand to lose more by watching something you don&#8217;t enjoy because others say it&#8217;s Good than you do by just watching whatever you feel like even if it&#8217;s &#8220;Bad&#8221;.</p>
<p>Anyway, all that being said, I think a certain part of the appeal of Hatsukoi Limited is precisely because it doesn&#8217;t attempt to bite off more than it can chew.  The conflicts are simple and straightforward because most of them are only given one or two episodes, and need to wrap up cleanly within that time.  It&#8217;s more like a collection of short stories centered around a common theme, and isn&#8217;t necessarily trying to be overly ambitious in that regard.  So certainly, this type of storytelling approach won&#8217;t appeal to everyone, &#8220;good&#8221; or &#8220;bad&#8221; aside.  Apparently, it&#8217;s just not your sort of show; fair enough.  I would say, personally, it isn&#8217;t necessarily my favourite type of show either (I too tend to favour romantic dramas and shows with a bit more conflict and introspection), but at the same time I was able to enjoy it within the scope it gave itself.  It&#8217;s one of the few times where the 12-episode length felt like the right amount of time for the content, and things just seemed to &#8220;click&#8221;.</p>
<p>So, anyway&#8230; the good part of the experience is that you now have a better sense of what shows to gravitate towards and to avoid going forward, and that&#8217;s always a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorrow-kun</title>
		<link>http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/2009/08/26/when-subjectivity-and-objectivity-clash-looking-back-on-hatsukoi-limited/comment-page-1/#comment-4127</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorrow-kun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/?p=2382#comment-4127</guid>
		<description>Sounds like you wanted more introspection, which I think is a fair call.  I liked Hatsukoi, but I&#039;d be the first to admit that the characters are anything but deep.  I&#039;d say it was a consequence of the fact that there were so many characters, and not a great deal of time to truly explore any of them to a great degree.  Does it make the show a failure?  No.  Does it make it pale in comparison with other character-driven anime dramas?  Definitely.  I&#039;d say it was an enjoyable distraction, but it&#039;s not the kind of anime that lingers, like Honey and Clover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like you wanted more introspection, which I think is a fair call.  I liked Hatsukoi, but I&#8217;d be the first to admit that the characters are anything but deep.  I&#8217;d say it was a consequence of the fact that there were so many characters, and not a great deal of time to truly explore any of them to a great degree.  Does it make the show a failure?  No.  Does it make it pale in comparison with other character-driven anime dramas?  Definitely.  I&#8217;d say it was an enjoyable distraction, but it&#8217;s not the kind of anime that lingers, like Honey and Clover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digitalboy</title>
		<link>http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/2009/08/26/when-subjectivity-and-objectivity-clash-looking-back-on-hatsukoi-limited/comment-page-1/#comment-4126</link>
		<dc:creator>digitalboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/?p=2382#comment-4126</guid>
		<description>I avoided Hatsukoi Limited because it&#039;s a show that wants you to think it&#039;s realistic but isn&#039;t, and because I could tell the show would really piss me off if I watched it.

The title of this post is misleading. and you still need to work on your goddamn tldr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I avoided Hatsukoi Limited because it&#8217;s a show that wants you to think it&#8217;s realistic but isn&#8217;t, and because I could tell the show would really piss me off if I watched it.</p>
<p>The title of this post is misleading. and you still need to work on your goddamn tldr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghostlightning</title>
		<link>http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/2009/08/26/when-subjectivity-and-objectivity-clash-looking-back-on-hatsukoi-limited/comment-page-1/#comment-4124</link>
		<dc:creator>ghostlightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/?p=2382#comment-4124</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Basically, my problem with Hatsukoi is that it makes too much sense. All of the characters’ first loves are ordinary, realistic, just like things were for me and everyone else out there. Some end with success and others with failure, but by and large, they’re all plausible.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Noooooooooo. Ordinary yes. Realistic? No.

I don&#039;t understand what makes these situations realistic for you. Enomoto falling for Kappa-face is a &lt;i&gt;fantasy&lt;/i&gt;. Enomoto &lt;i&gt;chasing&lt;/i&gt; after kappa-face is a delusion.

Onii-chan &lt;i&gt;obsession&lt;/i&gt;/stalking/borderline raep is...  a fantasy of people who don&#039;t have imoutos (like me).

There&#039;s nothing wrong with these things being fantasies or delusions. They&#039;re rather cute and funny for being so. These aren&#039;t my problems with this show. My problem is the last two episodes. As a 10-ep anime this show is a very very pretty, lighthearted romp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Basically, my problem with Hatsukoi is that it makes too much sense. All of the characters’ first loves are ordinary, realistic, just like things were for me and everyone else out there. Some end with success and others with failure, but by and large, they’re all plausible.</p></blockquote>
<p>Noooooooooo. Ordinary yes. Realistic? No.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand what makes these situations realistic for you. Enomoto falling for Kappa-face is a <i>fantasy</i>. Enomoto <i>chasing</i> after kappa-face is a delusion.</p>
<p>Onii-chan <i>obsession</i>/stalking/borderline raep is&#8230;  a fantasy of people who don&#8217;t have imoutos (like me).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing wrong with these things being fantasies or delusions. They&#8217;re rather cute and funny for being so. These aren&#8217;t my problems with this show. My problem is the last two episodes. As a 10-ep anime this show is a very very pretty, lighthearted romp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
